Leaderboard01 · Provider · last updated Oct 16, 00:00 UTCWebsite 03
Triton
79.1latency score79
win rate20%
samples670,669
success99.4%3,781 failed
Wrong datadata_mismatch2,88476%Stalestale79221%HTTP errorhttp_error431%RPC errorrpc_error251%Network errornetwork_error221%Timed outnetwork_timeout150%
Behind leaderHelius−14.5 score
02 · Latency over time · 24hcold · all regions
No samples in the last 24h. Run pnpm benchmark to populate.
03 · Score by regionhigher is better
- AP Northeast88.9
AP Northeast score
Score = 0.25·L + 0.25·W + 0.25·R + 0.2·C + 0.05·F
L(Latency)83.4×0.25=20.85W(Win rate)72.5×0.25=18.14R(Reliability)99.9×0.25=24.98C(Correctness)99.8×0.20=19.95F(Freshness)100.0×0.05=5.00=88.9
- EU Central85.7
EU Central score
04 · Latency by method · p50 cold0
No samples in the last 24h.
05 · Failure breakdown · 24h3
06 · Transaction sends · 24hlanding benchmark
0.0send score /100
0.0%landing rate
— / —slot latency p50 / p95
8,762cost lamports/tx
How Triton performs at landing real transactions on-chain. See the full sends leaderboard and sends performance.