Leaderboard01 · Provider · last updated Oct 18, 00:00 UTCWebsite 02
Quicknode
85.4latency score85
win rate31%
samples658,089
success100.0%196 failed
HTTP errorhttp_error13870%Timed outnetwork_timeout5528%RPC errorrpc_error32%
Behind leaderHelius−8.2 score
02 · Latency over time · 24hcold · all regions
No samples in the last 24h. Run pnpm benchmark to populate.
03 · Score by regionhigher is better
- EU Central96.4
EU Central score
Score = 0.25·L + 0.25·W + 0.25·R + 0.2·C + 0.05·F
L(Latency)95.3×0.25=23.83W(Win rate)91.2×0.25=22.79R(Reliability)99.1×0.25=24.77C(Correctness)100.0×0.20=20.00F(Freshness)100.0×0.05=5.00=96.4
- AP Southeast95.6
AP Southeast score
04 · Latency by method · p50 cold0
No samples in the last 24h.
05 · Failure breakdown · 24h2
06 · Transaction sends · 24hlanding benchmark
0.0send score /100
0.0%landing rate
— / —slot latency p50 / p95
8,750cost lamports/tx
How Quicknode performs at landing real transactions on-chain. See the full sends leaderboard and sends performance.