Leaderboard01 · Provider · last updated Oct 15, 00:00 UTCWebsite 05
Alchemy
68.9latency score63
win rate13%
samples666,508
success99.1%5,888 failed
Wrong datadata_mismatch2,57644%Stalestale1,31722%RPC errorrpc_error1,06018%Incomplete dataincomplete81614%Timed outnetwork_timeout1022%Invalid responsebody_invalid120%Quota exhaustedquota_exhausted50%
Behind leaderHelius−24.7 score
02 · Latency over time · 24hcold · all regions
No samples in the last 24h. Run pnpm benchmark to populate.
03 · Score by regionhigher is better
- NA West94.1
NA West score
Score = 0.25·L + 0.25·W + 0.25·R + 0.2·C + 0.05·F
L(Latency)95.7×0.25=23.93W(Win rate)90.1×0.25=22.52R(Reliability)99.9×0.25=24.98C(Correctness)99.8×0.20=19.96F(Freshness)53.6×0.05=2.68=94.1
- NA East79.8
NA East score
04 · Latency by method · p50 cold0
No samples in the last 24h.
05 · Failure breakdown · 24h2
06 · Transaction sends · 24hlanding benchmark
0.0send score /100
0.0%landing rate
— / —slot latency p50 / p95
8,746cost lamports/tx
How Alchemy performs at landing real transactions on-chain. See the full sends leaderboard and sends performance.